What happens to provinces which do not sign?
The Covenant pages -
previous •
next
The Covenant is presented as a voluntary arrangement which
will not affect the autonomy and governance of provinces, whether or not they
sign it.
In reality, however, the intention is to treat
non-signatories as less Anglican, or as some documents put it, 'second track'.
In 2006 the Archbishop of Canterbury suggested that the relationship between
the two sets of provinces would be 'not unlike that between the Church of
England and the Methodist Church', which seems to imply that those not signing
would not be considered Anglicans at all!
This is confirmed by the Covenant text. The Introduction
(§5) states that 'To covenant together is not intended to change the character
of this Anglican expression of Christian faith', but whatever the intentions,
the small print does. By signing, provinces will affirm that 'recognition of,
and fidelity to, this Covenant, enable mutual recognition and communion'
(§4.2.1). Until now, in the absence of any signed covenant, 'mutual recognition
and communion' have applied to all
Anglican provinces; it is only in the last few years that the campaigners
against the North American provinces have undermined it. To sign the Covenant
is therefore to side with the schismatics and affirm the
innovation that 'mutual recognition and communion'
depends on 'recognition of, and fidelity
to, this Covenant'. Until now it has not depended on any such thing.
Similarly signatories will commit themselves to the view
that the Covenant is 'foundational for the life of the Anglican Communion'
(§4.1.2). To call it 'foundational' is a strong word, making quite clear that
it is essential for membership of the Communion: in other words, that the
signatories will no longer consider the non-signatories part of the Communion.
In any case there remains any doubt about the matter the
power to exclude has already been pre-empted: in June 2010 the USA was
excluded from an ecumenical committee on this basis,
even though the Covenant is a long way from coming into force.
Of course provinces which refuse to sign will consider
themselves just as Anglican as they are now. The Covenant will therefore
institutionalise not only schism - by producing two distinct blocs of
provinces, the signatories and the non-signatories - but in addition a built-in
conflict between them as both will claim to be Anglican but the signatories
will deny that the non-signatories are.
The Covenant pages -
previous •
next